You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
On 23 August 1989, while playing tennis in St. Tropez, Laing collapsed on the court and died. He was aged 61. As was typical of his character, he played despite having been warned that it was unwise because of the heat and having already had three minor heart attacks.
Several books have been published about Laing since his death. These include two major biographies, one by his son Adrian Laing (A. Laing, 1997), and another by John Clay, a writer and Jungian analyst (1997). Thirdly, there is a review concentrating on Laing's works and responses from contemporary commentators, by Zbigniew Kotowicz, a psychotherapist who trained with the Philadelphia Association (Kotowicz, 1997).
Also, in the last two years of Laing's life, Bob Mullan, a documentary film-maker, recorded two hundred hours of conversation with Laing. This allowed Laing to comment freely on all aspects of his life and activities (Mullan, 1995). The views expressed on the tapes augmented Laing's autobiography, Wisdom, Madness and Folly (1985), which only described the first thirty years of his life.
Taken together, these books provide a comprehensive insight into the man, his life and works, although other contributions continue to be made (Beveridge, 1998; Burston, 1996; Mullan, 1997). Ten years on since Laing's death seems an appropriate time for a consideration of these reviews and Laing's legacy. In conclusion, consideration will be given as to whether the issues Laing raised in his seminal work The Divided Self are as alive now for debate as when it was first published in 1960.
Both Adrian Laing's and John Clay's biographies cover the same ground. Clay acknowledges that he relied heavily for his material on Adrian Laing's biography as well as Bob Mullan's book and Laing's Wisdom, Folly and Madness. As a psychotherapist, Clay's book perhaps contains more speculative dynamic formulations on motives for Laing's actions, while Adrian Laing's book has a more personal, anecd