You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
Charles Brenner's new book, Psychoanalysis or Mind and Meaning (Brenner, 2006), is the fifth in a series that includes An Elementary Textbook of Psychoanalysis
(Brenner, 1955), Psychoanalytic Concepts and the Structural Theory (Arlow and Brenner, 1964), written with Jacob Arlow, Psychoanalytic Technique and Psychic Conflict (Brenner, 1976), and The Mind in Conflict (Brenner, 1982). They mark the steady evolution of the thinking of this imaginative and straight-talking clinician and theoretician. The journey began with a forceful defense of ego psychology and structural theory and has now arrived at an unadorned natural science psychology of intrapsychic conflict and meaning.
Psychoanalysis or Mind and Meaning is an intense 138 pages long, with 96 pages of text and 42 pages of appendices. The text is a concise, careful statement of psychoanalytic theory and practice as understood by Brenner after 60 years of practice and academic study. He begins with a powerful defense of psychoanalysis as a natural science and of the supreme importance in psychoanalysis of sustaining a scientific, analytic attitude. He emphasizes the importance of meaning as contrasted with economic or structural factors, a theme which runs through the book like a red thread. He confronts and rejects the primacy of the repetition compulsion and economic aspects of trauma over meaning, making his case for the primacy of meaning while remaining firmly within the boundaries of deterministic science. Meaning derives from the inevitable conflict of the pleasure principle with reality and with the danger situations inherent in the object relations and body experiences of childhood. The compromise formations which emerge from conflict become the content of mental life, both ‘normal’ and ‘pathological.’ The resulting inhibitions, symptoms, fantasies, dreams, slips and errors of daily life and all other complex mental content are compromise formations, expressions of meaning:
Anything a patient says or doe