You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
Many commentators offer a passing nod to Freud's interest in philosophy, dutifully noting the early influence of his teacher, Brentano, before expeditiously moving on to accept Freud's modest disclaimers of any serious investment in philosophical concerns. Alfred Tauber's Freud, the Reluctant Philosopher differs in placing Freud's relationship to philosophy on center stage, making the argument that Freud “knew philosophy and drew from that tradition as he built his theory, consciously or not” (Tauber, p. 25). Thus, we are treated to a detailed exploration of the influence of Brentano on Freud (Freud took six courses with him from 1874-76, the only nonmedical courses he took at university, and he met with him outside class [p. 29]), a series of reflections that situate Freud in relation to the dominant philosophical schools of the time (positivism, historicism and neo-Kantianism). Tauber presents the intriguing but controversial argument that Kant deserves to be recognized as the philosopher who was most crucial for Freud (his “philosophical North Star” [p. 9]), and an additional but not well-developed argument that locates Freud as part of a triangle with Kant and Nietzsche (pp. 11, 164, 173). Along the way, Tauber draws attention to a number of philosophers who are not commonly linked to Freud, such as Spinoza, Kierkegaard and Dewey, and offers insightful readings of philosophers whose work is no longer widely known, such as Dilthey, Windelband, Lange and Meynert.