You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
The following series of brief comments are responses to the controversy “On Winnicott's clinical innovations in the analysis of adults”, published in the last issue of the IJP. In that controversy Jan Abram (2012), Vincenzo Bonaminio (2012), and Michael Eigen (2012) presented their views on how they perceive the nature and extent of Winnicott's clinical innovations to the analytic practice of his predecessors and how they assess the value of these innovations to psychoanalysis. The aim was to open to exploration and discussion the very different understandings of Winnicott that seem to prevail among those who align themselves with Winnicott's thinking in the contemporary analytic scene, ranging from those who view him as one who applied his clinical sensitivities to the development of traditional psychoanalytic practice to those who regard him as revolutionary and radical.
As I noted in my introduction to that controversy (Blass, 2012), the three authors emphasized different facets of Winnicott's contribution, but there was substantial similarity as well. All agreed that his innovations were very extensive, referring to how he brought to the fore the notion of aggression as creative, the clinical relevance of the existence and role of relationships prior to the development of internal objects, the necessity of the analyst adopting the maternal role and, perhaps most notably, the necessity of the analyst promoting a state of “being together” that is thought, at times, to replace interpretation. It was suggested that according to Winnicott the analytic process can succeed when the analyst “functions like the good enough mother with her new born baby whose ego needs are supported by the m/other's ego” (Abram), “striv[es] to be real and alive for the patient”, “shows himself to be present” and “presents himself to the patient as a real object” (Bomaminio), and “go[es] through something together [with the patient]… live[s] through and gradually establishe[s]… a rhythm of