You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
At the beginning of this century a new initiative in psychoanalysis came into being. 2001 the precursor of the End of Training Evaluation Project (ETEP) started at the EPF Forum on Education in Budapest. In 2002 at the European Conference the Working Party on Comparative Clinical Methods (CCM) was born. Since then these Working Parties and others, which were founded later on, attracted hundreds of psychoanalysts adding a new dimension to the usual case presentations in groups. Until today the Working Parties have spread to North and Latin America. The panellists from various societies bear witness of this development.
The discussion among the panellists was supposed to be structured along the following slides:
What do WPs bring to the traditional case study?
Role of group process
Moderators: William Glover (USA), Bernard Reith (Switzerland). Panellists: Marina Altman (Uruguay), Abbot Bronstein (USA), Eike Hinze (Germany), David Tuckett (UK), Philippe Valon (France).
Successive scenes of elaboration (psychoanalytic session, clinical workshops, core working party)
Working Party methods: research validity
Working Party methods: questions
Working Parties: future directions