Psychoanalysis has made a singular contribution to our understanding of how we live with the past; most importantly, the concept of “deferred action” (it will become clear why I wish to retain the English translation) challenges the association of causality with a particular temporal direction, that is, the earlier-to-later direction of causal efficacy. The purpose of this paper is to explore the implications of “backwards causation” (as it were) based on an application of the theory of object-use to the problem of memory. I begin with some introductory comments on Winnicott’s theory of object-use, before presenting clinical observations on a patient’s emerging sense of the past. In the theoretical discussion that follows, I consider the problem of memory in light of the clinical example. A discussion of the continued importance of “deferred action” is presented together with the introduction of the concept of “reclamation” as a type of re-descriptive memory.