A series of observations about psychoanalysis via videoconference -videoconference teleanalysis- is presented in the general understanding that these settings produce a split between physical absence and the expectation of physical co-presence. This split has been put forward as involving a specific demand in terms of Ego integration for both members of the analytical dyad which interferes with accessing states of relaxation in unintegration. While this is a constant for all interactions by videoconference, it is of particular relevance for the psychoanalytical treatment if we include within its interests the possibility for the analysand to achieve states of unintegration as part of his/her emotional growth processes. The effort to overcome this condition is illustrated in comments of analysts about feelings of inauthenticity and discontent when trying to sustain evenly floating attention, as well as in the perception of a form of flattening of the lively nature of speech. However, this is not a constant for all teleanalyses and mutual knowledge can be an important mitigating feature. The focus of the discussion should be on the capacity of the analytical dyad to overcome the split due to videoconference teleanalysis and not on a generalisation of its consequences for the analytical work.