You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
To comment on IJP Open, you have automatically been assigned a Disqus profile. You can view and contribute to article discussions by clicking on the Discuss icon located in the left toolbar.
This work aims to achieve two main objectives. The first seeks to make a distinction between the concepts of dependency and those of addiction, which are frequently and unduly associated together. Unlike dependence, which corresponds to a trait that is intrinsic to human nature, addiction represents an evolutionary short circuit; a pattern of repetition that overrides self preservation and makes use of the mechanisms of denial and displacement as main defensive strategies. The second objective of this work is to attempt to link the objects of addiction to those of the nonhuman environment, which, under proper conditions, are essential to the formation of the normal human identity. Finally, independence is understood here as a cultural myth, unfeasible and inaccessible to our species. Faced with an unattainable expectation, the obstinate search for independence only increases the pain, desperation and anguish of human existence. With these biases, contrary to what is normally propagated, independence would be closer to pathology than to health.