You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
To comment on IJP Open, you have automatically been assigned a Disqus profile. You can view and contribute to article discussions by clicking on the Discuss icon located in the left toolbar.
The gradual change that has taken place in psychoanalytic technique within the Kleinian and post-Kleinian school of psychoanalysis since its emergence is essentially a paradigmatic shift in the way the transforming factor in psychoanalysis is perceived: from the centrality of interpreting unconscious phantasy (particularly when expressed in negative transference), to a refocusing on the patient's introjection of the analyst's mind, including the complex functions of reverie, mental digestion and so on, of which interpretation is but one possible expression amongst many. In this paper I will bring clinical material from a case I supervised to illustrate how these technical changes, manifested in clinical work, facilitate internal change in the patient. I argue that contemporary technique is now closer and more faithful to the Kleinian theory of mental development, and better reflects the central role it has always assigned to the good object and its introjection as a vehicle for development and change both in daily life and in analysis.