You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
To comment on IJP Open, you have automatically been assigned a Disqus profile. You can view and contribute to article discussions by clicking on the Discuss icon located in the left toolbar.
There is consensus within psychoanalysis and psychodynamic psychotherapy that initial interviews might play a fundamental role for both treatment process and outcome. The Three Level Model (3-LM) is a clinical tool that promotes group discussion to assess if there have been transformations in the patient, throughout a psychoanalytically oriented treatment. Although the 3-LM has been used for a decade within the International Psychoanalysis Association, it is still necessary to study its validity and reliability. OBJECTIVES & METHODS: Analyzing a single case of focused psychodynamic psychotherapy, this study evaluated change hypotheses inferred from the first 4 interviews by a 3-LM group and compared them to outcome measures after nine months of treatment. Outcome Questionnaire OQ.45.2, Symptoms Checklist SCL-90 and OPD-2 criteria were employed to estimate the patient’s symptomatic and structural change, respectively. RESULTS & DISCUSSION: There were major convergences among change hypothesis formulated within 3-LM and the outcome measures at nine months of treatment. However, there were some divergent points in the analyzed data. Results show a first step towards reliability and validity of 3-LM Model, and the OPD-2’s contribution to psychodynamic practice-oriented research. Implications focused on 3-LM and OPD-2 criteria as well as future research are discussed.