You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
To comment on IJP Open, you have automatically been assigned a Disqus profile. You can view and contribute to article discussions by clicking on the Discuss icon located in the left toolbar.
This essay takes as its focal point a recent play, Alice Birch's Anatomy of a Suicide (2017), which ponders the question of gendered perpetuity of suicide as a potentially inherited or contagious phenomenon through its depiction of three generations of suicidal women. The foremost task posed to any critical exploration of the play is to explain how this transmission recurs across three generations. There are two principal conceptual approaches that broach this dilemma: the genetic-biological and the phenomenological. This essay undertakes an exploration of the psycho-dynamics of the various acts of suicide depicted in the play by gauging these two approaches against one another. Accordingly, the essay investigates how a suicidal identity is constructed in the play by treating suicide as much an ambiguous gesture or a human act of intentionality and free will as a pathology. To this end, we will develop a nuanced theoretical framework by drawing on the recent phenomenological approaches to the question of suicide in conjunction with various aspects of Julia Kristeva's conceptualisation of melancholic depression, Nancy Chodorow's theory of mother-identification, and Cathy Caruth's conception of trauma as a performative and intergenerationally transmissible phenomenon.