You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
To comment on IJP Open, you have automatically been assigned a Disqus profile. You can view and contribute to article discussions by clicking on the Discuss icon located in the left toolbar.
Inspired by Ogden's call to continually rediscover foundational concepts in unexpected ways, from four corners of the world, analysts came together in dialogue around Thomas Ogden's 2024 paper, “Rethinking the Concepts of the Unconscious and Analytic Time.” This transcontinental conversation gave rise to a textured exchange reflecting the breadth and diversity of thought surrounding these two pillars of psychoanalytic theory. They explore what the unconscious and analytic time have come to mean to each of them�concepts steeped in layered with meaning, leading them to reconsider long-held assumptions, each within their own time zone, informed by their lived analytic experiences and theories. The unconscious and analytic time are basic constructs of psychoanalytic theory since Freud's earliest writings, yet Ogden's is distinctive: “There is no such entity as the unconscious.” (Ogden, 2024b, p. 280). Ogden also explores the experience of time within the analytic setting; proposes a binary but interwoven distinction between diachronic and synchronic time, where childhood trauma can be experienced for the first time. These authors propose neither a rebuttal nor an endorsement of Ogden's position, while taking up his invitation to freely respond from their psychoanalytic regions, engaging with Ogden's elusive notions.