You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
To comment on IJP Open, you have automatically been assigned a Disqus profile. You can view and contribute to article discussions by clicking on the Discuss icon located in the left toolbar.
This paper examines how the capacity for symbolic thinking can collapse under intense emotional pressure in social contexts—and how it can be restored. Across family, institutional, and civic settings, individuals are often recruited into roles that come to embody unspoken conflicts, anxieties, or historical tensions on behalf of a wider system. When such representational pressures converge, thinking may give way to blankness, paralysis, or enactment—not as individual failure, but as a sign that the system can no longer work through its own emotional demands.
Drawing on psychoanalytic concepts of projection, role, and containment, the paper argues that mission—understood as a shared, internalized sense of purpose—functions as a symbolic third that restores orientation when structural boundaries weaken, and emotional containment fails. Through clinical, institutional, and civic examples, the paper shows how recognizing representational pressures and reconnecting role to purpose can reopen symbolic space and support reflective action under strain.