You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
To comment on IJP Open, you have automatically been assigned a Disqus profile. You can view and contribute to article discussions by clicking on the Discuss icon located in the left toolbar.
This paper proposes a psychoanalytic framework for understanding trans identity as an expression of human developmental diversity rather than a pathological deviation. It draws on Kernberg's object relations theory, contemporary epigenetic research, Butler's theory of gender performativity, and the historical emergence of authenticity as a cultural imperative to conceptualise gender identity as the outcome of interactions between biological plasticity, relational internalisations, and sociocultural norms. Low-intensity self-object internalisations are presented as a central mechanism through which culturally shared realities-including gender binaries-are internalised and gradually transformed, enabling both stability and change in gendered subjectivity. Epigenetic and neurodevelopmental findings support a view of biological systems as responsive to relational and environmental contexts, challenging essentialist models of sexual difference. Finally, the paper situates trans experience within the modern imperative of authenticity, suggesting that trans identities emerge at the intersection of developmental plasticity, sociocultural change, and the demand to live authentically, and argues that psychoanalysis should approach trans subjectivity as a legitimate stabilisation of gendered experience rather than as pathology.