This discussion depicts Pinato and Moia's article as the drawing together of the intellectual power of complexity systems theory and the intuitive wisdom of Bergson's philosophy to bring forth, both within the textual style of the authors' article and within the clinical process they describe as image subjectification, a dialogic tension between clarity and ambiguity—a tension that facilitates the seizing and grasping of those tiny points of potential growth within a traumatic clinical narrative that appears repetitive and flat. The image that arrives within the mind of the analyst is understood as a snapshot view of complexity in motion.