You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
My discussion of Dr. Goldstein’s paper “Trust and Suspicion or Sameness of Difference? Reframing Hermeneutics with the Invisible Other” centers on a key clinical question: what, if any, are the limits to therapeutic understanding and interpretation? In distinction to Goldstein, and in returning to Ricœur and Freud, I caution against unduly limiting the interpretive range of what can be shared between a patient and their analyst.