You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
Against the backdrop of the global outbreak of Covid-19, the question of why therapists experience remote psychotherapy as more taxing than traditional face-to-face encounters, is interrogated. From an experience-near perspective, I draw on concepts such as reverie, the frame, and holding; self psychological constructs such as self-states and empathy; and reference emotion regulation from the perspectives of neuroscience and social psychology.
At a meta-level, this different way of working is unusually tiring because rapid change without warning in response to a pandemic—which is happening to therapists too—is intrinsically demanding. Anxiety is a key consideration. At a finer scale, I proffer a set of ideas regarding the implications for core aspects of the psychoanalytic scaffolding: how reverie can be hampered and confidentiality compromised; how holding can become less reliable, empathic attunement harder to maintain, and therapist self-cohesion disrupted. In consequence, the therapist has to work harder. The heightened importance of therapist self-care, ongoing professional development, and the need to hold the frame in mind, are suggested as strategies for ensuring clinically and ethically sound practice.