You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
Since Freud, the study of transference has been one of the most important sources of knowledge regarding the child's psychological processes. As the interpretation is the main expression of the analyst, the patient's relation to it becomes the preponderant field in that study. Moreover, the degree in which the interpretation can be acceptedand as similated depends on this relation. The analysis of the patient's relation to the interpretation hence acquires a threefold interest: it is a study of infancy, it is a working-through of the transference, and it is an indispensable therapeutic (technical) requisite.
After Freud (1912, 1917) several analysts have devoted special attention to this subject, to mention W. Reich (1933), K. Horney (1936), and M. Klein (1932) among others. In the Argentine, Alvarez de Toledo (1955), Gonzalez (1956), G. Racker (1957), and others have dealt with different aspects of this wide topic. The present paper will refer, on the one hand, to infantile situations already known, exemplifying them through the patient's relations to the interpretation. In this regard, its aim is to contribute towards a closer contact between our theoretical knowledge and analytic practice. On the other hand, we shall meet with some rather obscure points and shall attempt to contribute to their clarification. Furthermore, through the material to be presented, I shall try to confirm the succession of certain situations of pain, anxiety, and defence, and their dynamic interrelation, as set forth in my paper (1957) on ‘Stratification’.
The return of the child's relation to the breast in the patient's attitude towards the analyst's interpretative capacity and