You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
As a practicing psychotherapist in Japan, I have been impressed that from the beginning of treatment, patients consistently seek to depend on the therapist rather than to explore their psychological difficulties. Therefore, the need for dependency and the fear of rejection by the significant person (therapist) have to be focused on in the therapeutic relationship. From the very beginning of psychotherapy, patients examine and test whether or not the therapist is dependable and whether or not the therapist could be a love-object. There seems to be an extraordinarily strong need for identification with the therapist. It might be regarded as a need to fuse with or melt into the therapist. It is usually so strong that I often have experienced fear of losing myself and my identity. T. Doi proposed the Amae Theory to explain this phenomenon in the psychotherapeutic situation in Japan and extended it as the key concept to be explored in Japanese culture. I think the Amae Theory, although well accepted in professional circles, is not sufficient to explain interpersonal relationships in Japan, particularly not the psychotherapeutic relationship. The purpose of this