You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
Correspondences between the analyst's unspoken thoughts and the analysand's subsequent verbalized associations occur during psychoanalytic sessions. At times, the correspondences are not clear-cut and can be lost easily in the flow of the analysand's associations. Sometimes they are activated by concurrent sensory cues from the analyst of which he may be unaware, but which are picked up by the patient. However, on other occasions, the correspondences are striking, unmistakable and not sensory-related. Even then, the analyst may regard them all too quickly as due to chance or coincidence and dismiss them as such. But if the analyst goes so far as to wonder whether correspondences characterized by being extrasensory and occurring under consistent conditions are instances of thought-transference or telepathy, powerful arguments against this likelihood are apt to come to his mind. The result, almost invariably, is to discourage further exploration of such possibilities. This may be so even when, at the beginning of an analytic hour, the analyst is preoccupied with certain issues and the patient's first associations reflect these issues. It should be noted that the terms themselves, thought-transference and telepathy, tend to be used interchangeably with the former being considered the simpler of the two (Jones, 1957).