You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
Let me start by saying that I like Dr. Brenner's paper. I will discuss the reasons in a moment or two, but first I must thank him for absolving me from a little bit of professional guilt that I didn't know I had until I read his paper.
Having come from a psychologically remote area of Brooklyn, and having attended a high school which emphasized the physical sciences, I had never heard of Sigmund Freud until I arrived at the University of Chicago as an undergraduate. There, I was initiated into coffeeshop psychoanalysis. I met up with the bubbling, volcanic id; the brooding, reproachful superego; the sunny, clear-eyed ego—each with its own theme like the characters in Peter and the Wolf. Little did I know that I was learning about the structural theory. And little did I realize that forty years later I would be discussing the retirement of that famous trio.
I continued to read in Freud and about Freud throughout medical school and residency—the easy stuff, naturally—the clinical papers,