You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
To the Editors:
I wish to call your attention to an article printed in your journal, Volume 2, number 4, in 1993. In the article, “Perverse Transference and Psychoanalytic Technique: An Introduction to the Work of Horacio Etchegoyen,” Richards makes a statement that is false. On page 467, she states, “Thus, , a Kleinian, believed …”
Glover was never a Kleinian. In fact, Klein felt very much in battle with him during the period of the so-called controversial discussions. I think this misunderstanding on Richard.’ part may have thrown a significant piece of her argument into question. Ralph Greenson, a Freudian, states in 1974, “the approach of the Kleinian analysts described … is in striking contrast to that of the majority of Freudian analysts (; ; ) …” (p. 38).