You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
Journal of Social Work Practice, November 2004, Volume 18, Number 3: 283-98
All abstracts are reproduced with the permission of the publishers.
Infant observation has long been an essential part of many clinical trainings, as well as a component of some academic courses in applied psychoanalysis, but its research potential is just beginning to be tapped. This paper reviews some of the literature on infant observation as a research method. This type of naturalistic observation is compared and contrasted with empirical research in the laboratory with regard to the results that may best be obtained by each method. Strategies for the retrieval of information from process recordings are discussed, and the importance of convergent findings from different lines of enquiry and of theoretical triangulation is considered. Observations illustrating language development are used as an example of the further dimension, which naturalistic observations can contribute to formulations deriving from clinical practice and empirical laboratory research. It is argued that convergences with psychoanalytic theory and with formulations from other disciplines, such as literary criticism, strengthen the confidence that may be accorded to formulations deriving from infant observation.
Journal of Social Work Practice, March 2004, Volume 18, Number 1: 19-32
This paper describes the findings of qualitative clinical research into risk-taking, dangerous behaviour in childhood using a post-Kleinian psychoanalytic approach undertaken by a child psychotherapist working in a local CAMHS. The purpose of the research was to find a way of understanding this behaviour using psychoanalytic thinking and comparing material from a number of cases across a wide age range (grouped into three age bands). Three different situations were identified in