You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
A number of problems will be in the mind of the reader as he studies this paper. Perhaps more than any other will be Jung's attempt to clarify confusion of thought by showing that the terms consciousness and unconscious may be reversed when Eastern texts and analytic theory are compared (cf. Jung (1939), C. W., p. 484). With the author's help and agreement the Editor has therefore capitalized the terms when reference is made to Vedantic philosophy. The ordinary lower case is preserved when the words are used in their analytic context. The same procedure is used with reference to the terms ‘Self’, ‘Identification’, etc.
Next it may not be altogether clear what the author means by depth psychology, a term which overlaps considerably with dynamic psychology, or is often used in a rather imprecise sense or as a qualifying phrase. His conception seems to correspond closely to that of Wyss (1967). If this is so it includes besides analytical psychology, psychoanalysis and its derivatives, existentialism, personal psychologists, etc.—Editor.