You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
One of Jung's contributions to the understanding of the psyche was based on the idea of two realities: one of images springing from the archetypes of the collective unconscious and the other from the learnt or given reality of the known world. Active imagination was a method evolved to induce a meeting between these opposing but complementary realities. What Jung called the transcendent function was a psychic function which came into operation to achieve this end.
A vital link may be made between the process of the deintegration of the self as described by Fordham and the transcendent function. In normal development, deintegration is in the service of the ego and leads to a widening of consciousness and a leap forward. As, however, deintegration involves a disruption of the previous state of integration, it can resemble a disturbance of a jigsaw puzzle while a pattern incorporating new material is forming. It may therefore feel like disintegration with attendant regressive symptoms. In clinical practice with sick people this disturbance of the status quo, whenever a new factor seeks a place in the psychic economy, may feel persecutory and be violently resisted or may be embraced with such fervour that all sense of proportion is lost. In the transference at such times, the analyst is likely to be experienced as representing the deintegrate. Should the reality of the analytical situation be lost sight of entirely the transcendent function does not work, at least for the time being. In passing, its function, as described, is, in my view, similar to that of Eros as he who joins things together, the messenger between gods and men, and the power of the mating urge between men and women. It is, perhaps, not so passing a reference as it leads into the fear which inhibits or destroys the creative impulse which is always concerned with putting things together in a way which had not previously been envisaged. This is also the Eros function of analysis.
What, then, if there is to