You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
Kohon's sizeable and very reasonably priced collection of seminal essays by independent psychoanalysts includes an excellent survey by him of the history of psychoanalysis in Britain, demonstrating the extent to which its beginnings and consequent development were, from 1911 onwards, closely allied with the professional life of Ernest Jones. From then onwards, in parallel with, though of course independently of, Jung's movement away from Freud, Jones began his life's work when he set up in 1913 the London Psychoanalytical Society—reborn as it was, in 1919, as the British Psychoanalytical Society. By 1926 its London clinic was founded, and by 1929 it became possible for the Society to host an international congress in Oxford. It is noteworthy also that when in response to a growing distrust of psychoanalysis in many quarters in Britain during the 1920s, the British Medical Association set up its special committee to investigate the subject in 1927-29, both Ernest Jones and H. Godwin Baynes, as a Jungian, were included in its membership. Such a co-operation was, no doubt, enforced in the face of a common danger, but the latter soon ceased to constitute a threat. It was also in the mid-Twenties that the arrival of Melanie Klein, supported as she was by Jones, polarised the British Society into two factions—those of Anna Freud and Melanie Klein. The fifteen years of conflict that ensued demanded that some attempt at compromise be made, so that the Controversial Discussions were set up between January 1943 and May 1944. Kohon's description of the battle between the two women deserves study by Jungians, for the complicated issues discussed seem to have emerged out of the differences between Klein's ‘positional’ and Anna Freud's ‘developmental’ view of the individual's life process. To an outsider looking on, those differences seem to have been made too much of—not an unusual happening in professional societies. Indeed, there could be signs of a similar phenomenon within a