You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
The study of Jung's life came to be of great importance because of his contributions to healing disciplines. With the widespread dissemination and popularity of his ideas over the last twenty years, his name and personality have now penetrated not only medicine and psychiatry, but also anthropology, art, sociology, and virtually all the humanities, as well as some of the sciences, such as physics. While it is important to understand the various facets of Jung's personality, it is crucial to recall that he saw himself primarily as a physician and psychiatrist who was involved with the task of healing. In order to do this he realised that not only was it necessary to study psychiatry and psychology beyond the traditional confines of medicine, but also theology, philosophy and art, as well as many other disciplines. Nevertheless, his primary influence relates to his desire to understand the healing process within the psyche, as well as his more expanded concept of individuation, that is, an individual realising the full potentialities of his life given at birth.
In his biography, Memories, Dreams, Reflections, written in his latter years, Jung gives an account, unparalleled in the history of medicine, psychiatry and psychology, of his own self-analysis and inner, self-realisation (JUNG 22).
It is clear from this work as well as from many others, that he saw himself as ‘the patient’, the one upon whom he wanted to experiment in order to understand the vicissitudes of illness and health, and for whom his understanding of the unconscious evolved throughout his life.
My life is a story of the self-realization of the unconscious. Everything in the unconscious seeks outward manifestation, and the personality, too, desires to evolve out of its unconscious conditions and to experience itself as a whole. I cannot employ the language of science to trace this process of growth in myself, for I cannot experience myself as a scientific problem.
What we are to our inward vision, and wha