You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
… The book is rather more than pure exposition and defence of Jung; in the section on archetypes particularly, there are references to comparable studies such as those made by the Cestalt psychologists and some continental biologists, and there is a section on the development of Jung's concept of the archetype showing how it has undergone considerable change over the last thirty years; it has expanded and in doing so has become more abstract. Besides this, in the section on symbols there is an interesting discussion on the relation between symbol, sign, and allegory that is not, I think, to be found in Jung's writings, at least they have not been collected together before or stated so clearly.…
(From JAP 5, I. January 1960)