Through clinical example and pictorial illustration, the author examines ways in which art offers a particular means of psychological transformation in states which may otherwise be inexpressible. A transference to the art work itself is proposed. It is submitted that, mediated within the transference/countertransference dynamic, this ‘scapegoat transference’ facilitates a particular process of psychological differentiation. The aesthetic qualities of art presented within analysis will resonate with other counter-transference affects. Clinical material demonstrates how observation of this - ‘aesthetic countertransference’ - leads to a distinction between the ‘diagrammatic’ and the ‘em-bodied’ image. The process of integration of shadow material is furthered by the temporary safe-keeping of the art work by the analyst.