Advances in the understanding and articulation of enactments allow a reassessment of analytical psychology's method of amplification. Subjective and objective aspects of the amplificatory process, evolving notions of its role in analysis together with the use of countertransference phenomena provide the frame for reexamination of this method. Using a single analytic day, this paper explores the inevitable play of enactments with a focus on countertransferential components contained in the act of amplification. An internal examination of such an act is used to attempt to identify and differentiate the operative personal, interpersonal and collective aspects. The impact and traces of this act are followed through the workings of the day and demonstrate that the impulse to amplify is a suitable object for analytic scrutiny. This leads to a more general question of the mythic nature of enactments.