You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
Brazilian analyst Roosevelt Cassorla delineates the parameters of his approach to enactments near the conclusion of his article when he writes, ‘I am concerned with discussing situations where the professional is involved in the enactment not only due to personal faults but also as a way of reaching deeply into traumatized areas’ (p. 177). His approach is analytic in the best sense of the word in that he elucidates an understanding of intense affective eruptions within the analytical relationship as part of the analytic process and not due to some failing in the patient or the psychological make up and approach of the analyst.
Cassorla offers his hypotheses in order ‘to pose questions and open new pathways, rather than to justify any faults or limitations on the analyst's part. They represent an attempt to understand them outside of his sphere of responsibility’ (p. 178). Primarily using the ideas of Bion, Cassorla begins by framing the place of the alpha-function and beta-elements with the analytic process. He posits two analytic extremes of dream and non-dream to set the stage for his paper. When the analytic process takes place and the alpha-function of both participants are activated, analyst and patient are