You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
A Dangerous Method , the new film directed by David Cronenberg with screenplay by Christopher Hampton, has made a splash in the popular culture and has been the centre of controversy in Jungian circles around the globe. Three Jungian analysts and a psychoanalytic psychotherapist offer their critiques and perspectives based on viewing the film: two are written as reviews; the other two are brief essays inspired by the film. Beverley Zabriskie comments on Cronenberg: ‘A screenwriter and film director cannot fully enter the frames of inner fantasies, the timbre of relational dynamics, and the context of external realities. Even when dialogue is taken from the written words of the relevant individuals, they are registered in the scales and intonations of the interpreter’. Along similar lines, Sharn Waldron says: ‘A Dangerous Method is less about understanding Jung, Freud, Spielrein and the beginnings of psychoanalysis than it is about being invited into Cronenberg's own phantasies, played out under the guise of a critical moment in the history of psychoanalysis'. In contrast Jan Wiener chooses ‘not to enter into the arena of historical accuracy about what is established fact, instead focusing on the transference and countertransference dynamics as they are portrayed in the film’. And Gottfried Heuer underscores the importance of the intersubjective moment enacted between Jung and Spielrein and the movement toward a two-person psychology. Further, he points out that Spielrein, was infinitely more than just ‘a muse to these great men’; she contributed to the initiation of child analysis and continued her writing and practice beyond the time frame that the film depicts and beyond the purview of her mentors.