You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
In January of 1907, Max Eitingon, a medical student in Zurich, came to Vienna with one of his more seriously disturbed patients to consult with Dr. Sigmund Freud. Like other physicians who had become familiar, chiefly through his writings, with the creator of the new psychology, Eitingon was eager for enlightenment and guidance from the living source. Although the patient was pronounced unsuitable for analytic treatment, Eitingon's visit to Vienna was not without its rewards. In those halcyon days of psychoanalysis when that far country with which it dealt was yet trackless save for the inroads made into it by its discoverer, the handful of adherents who had gathered around Freud met with him every Wednesday evening in his waiting room. And here Eitingon was invited to join them, the pioneering few, as they sat around the rectangular table, to talk, argue, discuss, present cases, project plans, ideas, areas for research, like all pioneers in movements extending the frontiers into the unexplored. Eitingon remained in Vienna for about a fortnight, not only attending the Wednesday evening meetings, but enjoying yet another privilege. “He passed three or four evenings with Freud,” says Jones, “and they were spent in personal analytic work during their long walks in the city. Such was the first training analysis!” (Jones, 1955) It should be added that Eitingon's training analysis did not end in the winter of 1907. Two years later, in 1909, he returned to Vienna, this time for three weeks, and again, on two