You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
In this chapter I consider some of the ways the analyst can be put in the position of an excluded observer who looks on rather than participates. From this position he may become critical of what he observes, and it is this “superego”-like role that elicits some of the fear of being looked down on in the patient. I briefly review some significant points in the development of ideas about transference, which owe so much to the discoveries of Freud. I then discuss some of the subsequent developments that were based on Freud’s work and have personally impressed me. In particular I mention Melanie Klein’s elaboration of an internal world peopled by internal objects and her description of the mechanisms of splitting and projective identification, both of which profoundly affect our understanding of transference.
Using some clinical material, I try to illustrate an important transference situation that I do not think has been sufficiently emphasised, although it is part of the “total situation” outlined by Klein. In this kind of transference the analyst finds himself in an observing position and is no longer the primary object to whom love and hate are
The paper on which this chapter is based was given to the English Speaking Weekend Conference on 14 October 2006 and read to a meeting of the British Psychoanalytical Society on 7 February 2007. That version of the paper was entitled “Transference Now and Then” in which the double meaning was meant to convey a comparison between a contemporary and earlier views of transference and also to suggest that transference was always present and did not arise only occasionally.
directed. Instead, he is put in a position of an excluded figure who can easily enact rather than understand the role he has been put in. In this situation he may try to regain the position as the patient’s primary object in the transference. Alternatively, he may avoid the transference altogether and make extra-transference interpretations and in this way ena