You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
How are we to explain the neglect of Stekel's role in the history of psychoanalysis, especially as a pioneer of brief therapy? This question has fascinated me since the early 1990s, after the discovery in New York of the typescript memoirs of Fritz Wittels with their tribute to Stekel's therapeutic genius (Timms, 1995, pp. 112-16). Soon after, at a conference in London whose proceedings were published under the title Freud in Exile: Psychoanalysis and its Vicissitudes, Martin Stanton highlighted the paradoxes of Stekel's position in a paper that culminated in the eloquent plea: ‘It is to be hoped that at some point critics and researchers […] will