You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
This is a truly remarkable book. Daniel José Gaztambide continues the ideas introduced in his earlier work, A People's History of Psychoanalysis: From Freud to Liberation Psychology (2019), by further exploring the profound relationship between psychoanalysis and broader sociopolitical issues, and investigating how a decolonial psychoanalysis is possible. In his previous book, Gaztambide established a link between psychoanalysis and liberation psychology by resurrecting their ‘historical memory’, thus uncovering the historical depth of decolonial psychoanalysis. In this new work, he builds upon the insights of that history, aiming to develop a decolonial psychoanalytic theory and clinical technique, supported by relevant case studies and practical examples – and informed substantially by the work of decolonial activist and psychiatrist, Frantz Fanon.
According to the author, Frantz Fanon ‘was one of psychoanalysis’ greatest innovators, the ‘most disputatious heir’ of not only Freud, but also Ferenczi and Lacan… contemporary psychoanalysis' most disputatious ancestor' (pp. 190–1). Fanon not only significantly advanced psychoanalytic theory and technique through extensive clinical practice but also actively engaged in revolutionary efforts, dedicating his life to the welfare of larger populations. Through this series of actions aimed at constructing a decolonial psychoanalysis, Fanon serves as a model for many psychoanalysts and all oppressed individuals. It is precisely based on the work of figures like Fanon that the author connects symptoms in the consulting room to the broader world, achieving a more comprehensive understanding of human society –
We live in a world of profound inequality along lines of race, class, gender, and sexuality … This world maintains itself through the machinations of the wealthiest who weaponize racism (particularly anti-Blackness), among other ‘isms’ to divide and conquer, turning us against each other in a sociopolitical game of ‘king o