Ellis discusses the recent publications of Eisenbud, Pederson-Krag, and Fodor on telepathy and psychoanalysis. He comes to the conclusion that their findings rest on flimsy evidence and are better explained by bias and coincidence than by mental telepathy. He lists a number of criteria which would have to be satisfied before he could accept the evidence for mental telepathy. He implies that the authors he discusses did not satisfy these criteria. These authors, in their rebuttal, attempt to justify their papers and conclusions. In his final rejoinder, Ellis is still unconvinced. This paper adds nothing except polemics to the growing literature on mental telepathy.