Eisenbud writes in the rôle of an embattled exponent of the occurrence of telepathy in the dreams of patients in analysis. He continues to defend himself against the attacks on him and others by Albert Ellis published in the Psychiatric Quarterly of October, 1947. He reports a dream which occurred to one of his patients during the week end he spent writing his reply to Ellis. The dream presented him with confirmation for the arguments with which he tried to meet the criticisms in Ellis's paper. In analyzing the patient's dream, which contained elements telepathically transferred from the author's unconscious, he presents autobiographical material revealing his ambivalent and unquiet attitude toward the thesis he is trying to maintain. 'If we make use of the telepathic hypothesis, the validity of which I claim to have been more than adequately established on independent grounds, we are in a position to contribute an interpretation of the dream under discussion which satisfies all the requirements of exact dream interpretation, whereas no other method seems to suffice.'