A review of the literature dealing with the technique of terminating analysis is given. Like all techniques, it should not be discussed by itself but must be

dynamically oriented in accordance with the individual case. Frequently the end phase of an analysis is characterized by a revival of symptoms. The intention of the patient to prolong the treatment is regarded as secondary gain. Dynamically, the repetition of symptoms can be looked upon as an attempt to master the neurosis. The analysis of transference, and particularly of counter-transference, is considered of great importance. Residues of transference are considered 'potential material for sickness'; the patient's ability to see the analyst as a real person in contradistinction to a transference figure is considered as a part of the patient's ability to accept reality. Three cases are discussed extensively to illustrate these points.

AUTHOR'S ABSTRACT