You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
October 30, 1951. TECHNICAL AND THERAPEUTIC ASPECTS OF CHARACTER RESISTANCE. Richard Sterba, M.D.
The term, character resistance, is derived from the theory and technique of Wilhelm Reich; hence, it is necessary to review and evaluate Reich's early psychoanalytic contributions. Psychoanalytic therapy was born when resistance
was taken into account and Reich participated in this development which was later largely replaced by Anna Freud's work. Reich's concept of 'character resistance' must be described as an artifact, although his first rule of therapy is still valid: interpretations should start from the ego rather than from the id. Reich stressed this particularly in the analysis of the transference. He assumed that all transference is a resistance and he regarded no initial transference as the repetition of a genuine object relationship, therefore distrusting any early positive transference. Reich believed that the form of the initial transference resistance is characteristic of the personality, hence an expression of character, and he called it 'character resistance'. He conceived of the mental apparatus as having a 'layer cake' structure and insisted that interpretations must follow this layering.
Reich's belief that all initial transference is a resistance is incorrect. Freud observed in 1915 that the resistance uses transference-love but does not create it nor diminish its genuineness. Reich's conception of transference is an outgrowth of his own aggressive and suspicious personality traits. An indication of this is the frequency with which he uses comparisons from the battlefield, speaking of resistance as a dangerous and tricky enemy which must be exterminated at all costs. he does not accept ambivalence as a basic fact of the instinctual life of man. When negative and positive elements appear in the transference, he thinks of them as arising from different layers rather than as evidence of ambivalence.
The systematic peeling off of psychic lay