Since the 'motor' of analysis is suffering, the question arises how one may analyze the 'normal' trainee, one who is relatively free of suffering. The motivations of trainees are various, but suffering, the need for personal change, is not a prominent feature. Should one therefore select neurotics as candidates, and if so, what type? To reduce the chances of being duped by the trainee, should one make inquiries or seek data from sources other than the trainee himself? How can we impose on the trainee that suffering which is considered indispensable as a motive force?