You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
Recent development in the social sciences and psychology influenced by psychoanalysis has led to conflict with traditional religious thought. The author maintains, apparently with metaphysical and theological premise, that there is no real conflict between science and religion, since these are two aspects of revealed truth. Physicists have been able to remain truly scientific without abandoning religion. Contemporary psychopathologists, however, have tended to deny that there can be any knowledge outside of science and have thereby elevated science itself to a faith. Where science endeavors to give scientific answers to theological and metaphysical questions, it strays from the path of science. This error occurs among psychopathologists because of their tendency to narcissistic overestimation of man's importance and capacity. What appears then to be an objective conflict between scientific psychopathology and religion is held by the author to be a manifestation of the essential inner conflict within confused scientists. It is a dangerous trend leading to a mechanistic conception of man with loss of that human person who is the concern of religion.
Nonreligious scientists who do not accept the author's metaphysical or theological premise will find the argument untenable. To them such postulation of 'inner conflict' may be suggestive of a renascent demonology, fashioned out of the temper of our anxious age.