You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
Harris describes the unconscious factors which he feels good parents and analysts possess in common—those which induce successful maturation in child and patient respectively. Through projective identification, parent and analyst guard against loss of libidinally cathected ego or self. They project their cathected selves onto the object, identify with it, and love themselves in the object, insuring their immortality. The parent lives on in the child. The analyst does not project his entire self as the parent does but only that part of himself which is culturally determined: the social and ethical values and the techniques of analysis and self-analysis. The patient is benefited because the empathic attitude of the analyst conveys to him a feeling of closeness and support which by decreasing basic anxiety makes repressive efforts less necessary and thereby frees energy for ego and emotional growth. Mention is made of less important factors which parent and analyst share and which insure them gratification and motivation, such as the object's gratitude and admiration, as well as the interest in establishing and guiding the next generation. The author appears on less sure ground here, as he seems to be describing rather complicated ego structures which may be culturally determined and which may be better analyzed in their component id and ego parts.