You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
This symposium attempts to consider the question: are individual and group psychotherapy opposed? Dr. Clifford Sager maintains they are not, and that both are indicated in many cases considered suitable for psychoanalytic therapy. His idea of concurrent therapy is that of a patient seen both in individual analysis and in the group with the same analyst—group analysis and individual analysis carried on simultaneously. However, Sager points out the differences between them. In the group, the therapist must share his work with all the patients, must stimulate or allow interaction between the patients, and must forego knowing everything that goes on within the patient. The patient is often changed by the experience he has in the group without necessarily having to go through deep, introspective examination of his own psychodynamics. In the group, transference is superficial, diluted, or attenuated, and most often there is a defense against the infantile neurosis; in individual psychotherapy, the deeper infantile neurosis is dealt with. The idea that the patient reacts in the group as he does in his individual family relationships is stressed. There is a rapid shift of transference