The author examines more intensively the follow-up study of one patient in order to evaluate more precisely the potentiality and limitations of the use of a series of follow-up interviews by an analyst other than the treating analyst. He has chosen for this study a 'satisfactorily' analyzed patient in an attempt to determine whether the same kind of transference phenomena would emerge as were observed in previously reported follow-up studies of less satisfactorily analyzed patients. Of significance is the fact that, despite a satisfactory analysis, the patient of this study experienced a brief recurrence of her original symptomatology in reaction to the interviews. This is understood as a manifestation of the residue of the analytic transference.