You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
It is tricky to decide in any particular behavior whether the ego is autonomous or not. For instance, automatic opposition to a drive impulse by an ego defense is considered autonomy of the ego from the id. Yet here the ego does not wield anticathectic force out of realistic consideration but primarily in response to the drive itself or to the superego. As Erikson has stated, 'A system must have its utopia. For psychoanalysis (that is, for id psychology) the ideal is "genitality".' For ego psychology it would appear to be autonomy, a slogan emblazoned on the banner of ego psychologists in their struggle against the excesses of traditional id-oriented thinking. What is needed at present is detailed consideration of the complex interactions between external inputs, endogenous inputs, and the structure of the psychic apparatus itself. Such explanatory