You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
When the hypnotized subject is in a state of negative hallucination (in other words, failing on command to see what is before him) he lacks the perception of psychic quality and therefore of consciousness. On the other hand, secondary process response and accurate reality testing in other respects is present, so the subject must be considered in a state of preconsciousness rather than unconsciousness. The system Cs has become projected onto the hypnotist who now functions as the subject's consciousness. Since the superego is also projected onto the hypnotist, the question can be raised as to whether Cs is not the sense organ of the superego; the other sense organs, those of the ego. Freud suggested this relation in Group Psychology but returned Cs to the ego in The Ego and the Id. In the situation of the subject being given contradictory commands—for instance, in being told a person is not in the chair yet being forced to explain the true reason the chair is not empty—such great ego splitting is required as possibly to engender psychosis. To avoid this, the subject wakes up or goes into deep sleep. This explanation supports Searles and others in suggesting that schizophrenia can have its onset in contradictory and conflicting attitudes from the parents toward the child.