You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
In this paper the authors review some of Freud's theoretical constructs concerning the term, sublimation. It is their thesis that the energy—transformation theory of sublimation is not tenable. Some interesting hypotheses are developed concerning the origin of affects within the ego. These are characterized as non-sensual affects accompanying function, which are present from the beginning in addition to libidinal (sensual) and aggressive affects. Affect cathexes are also involved in the mental representations of objects, self, and activities.
The most important and novel aspect of their paper deals with their concept of sublimation. For them an ego activity or skill in itself does not constitute a sublimation. In addition to an activity bringing about drive reduction in a modified form, in order for it to be considered a sublimation the achievement must not only subserve indirect drive discharge but also must be invested with a constant 'value cathexis', which they liken to object constancy. While the paper provokes considerable thought, there is need for further clinical validation to bridge the gap created by the authors' highly tentative hypotheses.