You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
The use of co-therapists of equal or comparable status is said to confound transference and countertransference reactions; to add unnecessarily to the complexity of the group situation; and to exaggerate the dependency needs of the therapists. There is a risk that unresolvable conflicts between the therapists may paralyze group momentum and the psychotherapy process. However, this practice has the advantage of ensuring the maintenance of the group despite the hazard of a therapist's absence; comes closer to replicating the original family situation of siblings and two parents; enriches the range and type of possible transference objects; and reveals additional facets of the therapists' personalities to the group. While all personality factors and professional affiliations of the therapists should be considered in pairing them, the ensuing relationship is formed in view of a future based on an ability to resolve stress. In the maintenance of this relationship, openness is a constant essential. Complementarity is also important while competitiveness is deleterious. Extra-group contact between the co-therapists must be viewed to some degree as related to the group.