You do not currently have permission to view the full text for this document. Please sign in to an account with an active subscription or contact support.
Rouart explores Viderman's thesis for its implications on the nature of unconscious fantasy and primal repression. We are inevitably forced to recognize the difficulties concerning the nature of primal fantasies. Some authors have claimed that these primal fantasies are the specific object of psychoanalysis. If primal fantasies are not given form except through the language of interpretation, how does one explain the occurrence of very primitive defenses such as splitting, projective identification, and primitive introjection? It would seem that there is still some minimal structure, some organization which characterizes primal fantasies, as shown by these primitive defense patterns. The traumatic character of a seduction may be due to the revival of these minimally structured primal fantasies. Viderman's work is stimulating in the development of our thinking about the nature of primal fantasies. The impossibility of knowing these fantasies other than through their derivatives has led to many diverse theories concerning their nature, from phylogenetic explanations to the Kleinian conceptions of their organization.